Imaging Interpretation of the Foot and Ankle with a focus on Diabetic Foot
If you are interested on this course, please click below link for further details:
Imaging Interpretation of the Foot and Ankle with a focus on Diabetic Foot
The British Association of Prosthetists and Orthotists (BAPO) was established to encourage high standards of prosthetic and orthotic practice. It is committed to Continued Professional Development and education to enhance standards of prosthetic and orthotic care. BAPO is the only UK body that represents the interests of prosthetic and orthotic professionals and associate members to their employers, BAPO enjoys the support of a high majority of the profession as members.
Studies of foot orthoses suggest that they can improve foot pain and function, although the precise mode of action of foot orthoses is poorly understood. It is proposed that they may act through the modification of abnormal stresses or motions occurring within the foot. The central aim of this thesis is to explore whether functional foot orthoses can systematically modify bone stress in the midfoot as measured on magnetic resonance imaging. Bone marrow lesion patterns quantified on magnetic resonance imaging was proposed as a surrogate measure of bone stress in the foot. A reliable method of bone segmentation and BML volume measurement was developed and applied in this thesis. In the interventional study of this thesis, the effect of functional foot orthoses on mechanical medial midfoot pain, foot impairment, patterns of bone marrow lesions and foot kinematics were investigated. Thirty seven participants with mechanical midfoot pain and medial midfoot bone marrow lesions participated in the study and were allocated to wear either functional foot orthoses (n=21) or a cushioning insole (n=16). The effect of the orthosis intervention on foot pain, impairment and volumes of magnetic resonance bone marrow lesions was compared in each group. In addition, the gait parameters and foot kinematics were assessed in a subset of 20 participants (functional foot orthoses n=10 and cushioning insole n=10). Foot pain and foot impairment outcomes improved more in the functional foot orthoses group than the control group wearing cushioning insoles. The results suggest that the volumes of bone marrow lesions in the medial foot bones were reduced systematically in the functional foot orthoses group. In comparison, those wearing the cushioning insole showed no change greater than measurement error. There was no evidence in the small subset of 7 participants, that foot kinematics were systematically altered when wearing either the cushioning insole or functional foot orthoses compared to in-shoe only analyses. The results reported in this thesis suggest that the biomechanical mechanism of functional foot orthoses in treating foot pain could be the modification of internal forces rather than their systematically influencing magnitudes of foot motion. This new data indicates that functional foot orthoses appear to have the potential to reduce foot pain and alter patterns of bone marrow lesions (a surrogate measure of bone stress) in the medial midfoot bones and further work is now required to explore this formally in larger studies.
BAPO are
pleased to announce the opening of delegate registrations for Conference
& Exhibition 2014 please take advantage of the Early Bird discount
which closes on 31 December 2013
BAPO members wishing to register should use their current login details to access BAPOnline - www.bapo.com Non-members should click on the link below, provide details requested, enter the Non Members activation in the box provided, in order to register and access BAPOnline - www.bapo.com http://www.bapo.com/Application/Member/SelfRegistration.aspx For further information or enquiries please contact the Secretariat on 0141 561 7217 or email conference@bapo.com |
BAPO are seeking presentations both Prosthetic and Orthotic of 12 minutes duration with up to 3 minutes for questions and answers.
For more details download submission instructions here
Background: Several conservative treatments for medial knee osteoarthritis such as knee orthosis and laterally wedged insoles have been shown to reduce the load in the medial knee compartment. However, those treatments also present limitations such as patient compliance and inconsistent results regarding the treatment success.
Objective: To analyze the effect of an ankle–foot orthosis on the knee adduction moment and knee joint alignment in the frontal plane in subjects with knee varus alignment.
Study design: Controlled laboratory study, repeated measurements.
Methods: In total, 14 healthy subjects with knee varus alignment were analyzed in five different conditions: without orthotic, with laterally wedged insoles, and with an ankle–foot orthosis in three different adjustments. Three-dimensional kinetic and kinematic data were collected during gait analysis.
Results: Significant decreases in knee adduction moment, knee lever arm, and joint alignment in the frontal plane were observed with the ankle–foot orthosis in all three different adjustments. No significant differences could be found in any parameter while using the laterally wedged insoles.
Conclusion: The ankle–foot orthosis was effective in reducing the knee adduction moment. The decreases in this parameter seem to be achieved by changing the knee joint alignment and thereby reducing the knee lever arm in the frontal plane.
Clinical relevance This study presents a novel approach for reducing the load in the medial knee compartment, which could be developed as a new treatment option for patients with medial knee osteoarthritis.
Source: http://poi.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/12/10/0309364613513297.abstract
Save the Date for the BAPO conference 2014.
When: 14th-16th March
Where: The Point, Lancashire County Cricket Club, Old Trafford, Manchester.
Its set to be a Fantastic Weekend with some great speakers so don't miss out Save the Date now!
BAPO are seeking presentations both Prosthetic and Orthotic of 12 minutes duration with up to 3 minutes for questions and answers.
For more details download submission instructions here
Medicare recipients given orthotic and prosthetic devices were more likely to remain active in the community and avoid facility-based care than similar Medicare patients who didn't receive such devices, a retrospective study found.
For example, patients receiving lower-extremity orthoses had fewer hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) admissions, and had about 10% lower Medicare costs after 18 months (P<0.05). Comparable Medicare savings were seen in patients with spinal orthoses and they also relied less on facility-based care (P<0.05).
The study results will be used to urge Medicare and other payers to make it easier for patients in need of prosthetics to receive them, the Amputee Coalition, a Manassas, Va.-based advocacy group that commissioned the study, said Tuesday.
The advocates said patients who receive orthoses and prosthetics will save Medicare money in the long run.
Although they relied less on facility-based care, patients receiving the orthotic and prosthetic devices did have more falls and fractures, and average Medicare episode payments weren't always lower. The increase in falls was most likely due to increased mobility because of the device, according to Allen Dobson, president of Dobson DaVanzo & Associates in Vienna, Va., the consulting firm that conducted the study.
"The increased physical therapy among O&P [orthoses and prosthetic] users allowed patients to become less bed-bound and more independent, which may be associated with higher rates of falls and fractures, but fewer emergency room admissions and acute care hospital admissions," the report concluded. "This reduction in health care utilization ultimately makes O&P services cost-effective for the Medicare program and increases the quality of life and independence of the patient."
Dobson, a former research director at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), and colleagues examined CMS data from 2007 to 2010 for patients who either had an amputation within the last year or who met predetermined etiological diagnoses. Patients who received a lower-extremity or spinal orthotic or prosthetic device were compared with those who hadn't received such devices.
The study compared healthcare utilization, Medicare payments, and negative outcomes such as fall and emergency department admissions for up to 18 months after receiving the device.
Generally, patients were found to be more mobile and therefore able to receive the physical therapy and rehabilitation required, and to avoid facility-based care.
With the data in hand, advocates hope it will be easier for patients to receive authorization for the devices.
"Insurers want to see the data that the healthcare system is better off if the service is provided," Susan Stout, interim president and chief executive of the Amputee Coalition, said in a call with reporters. "Now that the study is completed, we intend to use the information contained in the study to achieve fair insurance coverage for prosthetic devices."
Providers must prove the medical necessity of devices before insurers will pay for their use, a step which can be burdensome to patients and physicians. Insurers also have a tendency to provide the least expensive prostheses rather than one that maximizes a patient's mobility.
"For the first time, we can actually use the data ... that clearly demonstrates the efficiency and the efficacy of the services that we provide," Thomas Kirk, PhD, president of theAmerican Orthotic & Prosthetic Association, said in a call with reporters. "Not only are we providing services that can help out patients, we are also helping the American taxpayers save money."
While payers don't deny the devices, a number of patients are underserved by insurers, the advocates said on the call Tuesday. "Many payers have seen the cost of a prosthesis in a vacuum rather than seeing it as actually contributing to the overall improved health of the patient," Kirk said.
The authors hope to publish the results in a medical journal later.
Source: http://www.medpagetoday.com/PublicHealthPolicy/Medicare/41260
Link to report: http://www.amputee-coalition.org/content/documents/dobson-davanzo-report.pdf
Background: Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic inflammatory joint disease which affects the joints and soft tissues of the foot and ankle. Rocker shoes may be prescribed for the symptomatic foot in rheumatoid arthritis; however, there is a limited evidence base to support the use of rocker shoes in these patients.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of heel-to-toe rocker shoes on pain, disability, and activity limitation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Study design: Clinical trial.
Methods: Seventeen female patients with rheumatoid arthritis of 1 year or more duration, disease activity score of less than 2.6, and foot and ankle pain were recruited. Heel-to-toe rocker shoe was made according to each patient's foot size. All the patients were evaluated immediately, 7 and 30 days after their first visit. Foot Function Index values were recorded at each appointment.
Results: With the use of rocker shoes, Foot Function Index values decreased in all subscales. This reduction was noted in the first visit and was maintained throughout the trials.
Conclusion: Rocker shoe can improve pain, disability, and activity limitation in patients with rheumatoid foot pain. All the subjects reported improved comfort levels.
Clinical relevance The results of this study showed that high-top, heel-to-toe rocker shoe with wide toe box was effective at reducing foot and ankle pain. It was also regarded as comfortable and acceptable footwear by the patients with rheumatoid foot problems.