The British Association of Prosthetists and Orthotists (BAPO) was established to encourage high standards of prosthetic and orthotic practice. It is committed to Continued Professional Development and education to enhance standards of prosthetic and orthotic care. BAPO is the only UK body that represents the interests of prosthetic and orthotic professionals and associate members to their employers, BAPO enjoys the support of a high majority of the profession as members.
Tuesday, 16 December 2014
Indicators of Future Ulceration in Diabetes Patients of Low-Moderate Foot Risk
Saturday, 6 December 2014
Biomechanical Effects of Valgus Knee Bracing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Rebecca F. Moyer, PT, PhDa,
- Trevor B. Birmingham, PT, PhDa, , (Dr.),
- Dianne M. Bryant, PhDa,
- J.Robert Giffin, MD, FRCS(C)b,
- Kendal A. Marriott, BScKinc,
- Kristyn M. Leitch, PhDd
Objective
To review and synthesize the biomechanical effects of valgus knee bracing for patients with medial knee osteoarthritis.
Methods
Electronic databases were searched from their inception to May 2014. Two reviewers independently determined study eligibility, rated study quality and extracted data. Where possible, data were combined into meta-analyses and pooled estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for standardized mean differences (SMD) were calculated.
Results
Thirty studies were included with 478 subjects tested while using a valgus knee brace. Various biomechanical methods suggested valgus braces can decrease direct measures of medial knee compressive force, indirect measures representing the mediolateral distribution of load across the knee, quadriceps/hamstring and quadriceps/gastrocnemius co-contraction ratios, and increase medial joint space during gait. Meta-analysis from 17 studies suggested a statistically significant decrease in the external knee adduction moment during walking, with a moderate-to-high effect size (SMD=0.61; 95%CI: 0.39, 0.83; p<0.001). Meta-regression identified a near-significant association for the knee adduction moment effect size and duration of brace use only (β, -0.01; 95% CI: -0.03, 0.0001; p=0.06); with longer durations of brace use associated with smaller treatment effects. Minor complications were commonly reported during brace use and included slipping, discomfort and poor fit, blisters and skin irritation.
Conclusions
Systematic review and meta-analysis suggests valgus knee braces can alter knee joint loads through a combination of mechanisms, with moderate-to-high effect sizes in biomechanical outcomes.
Keywords
- knee osteoarthritis;
- valgus knee brace;
- biomechanics;
- knee adduction moment;
- systematic review;
- meta-analysis
Thursday, 4 December 2014
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, x2 Orthotists, London
Friday, 28 November 2014
NHS England¹s clinician survey on patients taking a more active role in their healthcare
Patients with long term conditions self-manage their condition at home the majority of the time. They have different levels of knowledge, skills and confidence in managing their own health and care – we describe this as the patient's 'activation' level.
Clinicians have different training, orientations and views about a patient's role in their care which results in different approaches when working with people with long term conditions. NHS England is carrying out this survey with doctors, nurses and allied health professionals to understand these views and approaches. It will help us to develop a baseline of clinicians' attitudes across the range of professionals and understand their support needs in this area.
Your response is very important and the survey will take less than 10 minutes to complete. To complete the survey, please go tohttps://www.surveymonkey.com/s/CS-PAM_AHPs
The survey closes on 12 December. All responses are anonymous and not associated with any personally identifiable information. Aggregated results will be published and shared with stakeholders.
Snapshot of good practice - Rehabilitation Service Improvement
Tuesday, 25 November 2014
Monday, 24 November 2014
Making rehabilitation work better for people - 1 December 2014 - Webinar Content for Comment
Dear Colleague
Further to our recent webinar invite, we would welcome your comments on the attached webinar draft outline in terms of the subject and areas you would wish to see covered in the presentations and question and answer session.
Please note that this webinar is not meant to highlight individual professions' best practice but focus on the overarching messages and themes for a very wide-ranging audience. There will be opportunities and we would encourage professional bodies to signpost these more specific examples via posting on the on line forum
If you would like to see your ideas reflected in the forthcoming webinar series, please email Carol Cahill at cahillc@csp.org.uk with your suggestions about the subject areas you would like discussed, as well as any questions for inclusion in the Q & A sessions.
Friday, 21 November 2014
Webinar - Making Rehabilitation Work Better for People - Save the Date 1 December 2014
Thursday, 20 November 2014
Thursday, 6 November 2014
Friday, 31 October 2014
Exercise improves gait, reaction time and postural stability in older adults with type 2 diabetes and neuropathy
Wednesday, 22 October 2014
Prosthetist Vacancies - Opcare - Roehampton, Newcastle & Cambridge
Tuesday, 21 October 2014
Clinical Audit Awareness Week
Trulife - Orthotist - North West London & The North West/Midlands
Monday, 13 October 2014
Opcare Job Advertisement - 3 x Orthotist positions, England
Sunday, 12 October 2014
UNISON NHS Agenda for Change Action
UNISON asks that if a member is employed directly by an NHS organisation on Agenda for Change terms and conditions then they are covered by the action and able to show support. Members who choose to strike would lose pay as a result.
If a member is self employed, or employed under a contract for services, then they are not covered by the action. If this is the case we would ask that they do not cross picket lines or cover the work of striking workers. These BAPO members cannot be asked to strike or take action short of strike action.
It is unlikely that any workplaces will close as a result of the strike however if so then any BAPO members should be informed by their employer and receive their full normal pay.
UNISON and other trade unions will likely be maintaining picket lines at entrances to workplaces. Pickets are allowed to peacefully persuade workers and others not to cross the picket line but anyone who decides to cross must be allowed. Anyone crossing the picket line will also likely be asked to not undertake any duties of to cover those who are on strike.
Of course it is an individual decision and BAPO members can explain that they have not been balloted and are not on strike.
The background to the strike is here http://www.unison.org.uk/at-work/health-care/key-issues/nhs-pay/home/ .
Friday, 10 October 2014
Monday, 6 October 2014
Ankle-foot orthoses in children with cerebral palsy: a cross sectional population based study of 2200 children
Ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) is the most frequently used type of orthosis in children with cerebral palsy (CP). AFOs are designed either to improve function or to prevent or treat muscle contractures.
The purpose of the present study was to analyse the use of, the indications for, and the outcome of using AFO, relative to age and gross motor function in a total population of children with cerebral palsy.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed of 2200 children (58% boys, 42% girls), 0-19 years old (median age 7 years), based on data from the national Swedish follow-up programme and registry for CP. To analyse the outcome of passive ankle dorsiflexion, data was compared between 2011 and 2012.
The Gross motor classification system (GMFCS) levels of included children was as follows: I (n = 879), II (n = 357), III (n = 230), IV (n = 374) and V (n = 355).
Results: AFOs were used by 1127 (51%) of the children. In 215 children (10%), the indication was to improve function, in 251 (11%) to maintain or increase range of motion, and 661 of the children (30%) used AFOs for both purposes.
The use of AFOs was highest in 5-year-olds (67%) and was more frequent at lower levels of motor function with 70% at GMFCS IV-V. Physiotherapists reported achievement of functional goals in 73% of the children using AFOs and maintenance or improvement in range of ankle dorsiflexion in 70%.
Conclusions: AFOs were used by half of the children with CP in Sweden.
The treatment goals were attained in almost three quarters of the children, equally at all GMFCS levels. AFOs to improve range of motion were more effective in children with a more significant decrease in dorsiflexion at baseline.
Author: Maria WingstrandGunnar HägglundElisabet Rodby-Bousquet
Credits/Source: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2014, 15:327